« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100  (Read 16463 times)

Offline DRxBMW

  • ^ SuperNatural Motobricker
  • Posts: 902
Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« on: May 18, 2011, 07:38:32 AM »
edit 3/30/2016 by motobrick johnny...

the Hall_Effect_Sensor _Test_K100.pdf in this 1st post is INCORRECT because the positive and negative terminals in its diagram and text have been incorrectly labeled. it is left here for historical purposes...

the BertVogelK100TroubleShootingStarting.pdf in this 1st post is right... added 3/30/2016 for historical purposes...

look at reply#2 where the original author has corrected the original post pdf...The positive and negative terminals are correctly labeled in that one.

look at reply#5 in this thread for the right attachment... thanks bert vogel...

there you go...

j o


Another file from Damun concerning that pesky HES going south.

Gary 
Logged
Gary
Williamsport,Pa

1994 K 75 ABS "custom"
2005 F 650 GS

Offline Damun

  • Curious
  • Posts: 6
Re: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2014, 08:14:10 PM »
I came into a small stash of HES -they test good cold and at 200 F.

Am I correct that the one on the left is for the K75, and the one on the right, with evenly spaced picklups is for the K100, K1, K1100 LT & RS?

 :dunno

Logged

Offline Damun

  • Curious
  • Posts: 6
Re: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2014, 08:34:18 PM »
Just came across DrBMX posting of my 2009 article on HES testing.

Noted a glaring error caused by my lysdexia.

In the diagrams, I reversed polarity, which would give false results -- namely, the LED would stay on when you stuck a knife into the slot.

Here is the proper polarity on an easily-rigged tester & the plug:
Logged

Offline Scott_

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 2242
Re: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2014, 10:38:23 PM »
I would suggest that you may be correct with that analysis....
Logged
  • My Garage
1995 K1100LT 0302044
2017 FLHTK Ultra Limited
1997 K1100LT 0302488 (R.I.P.)
1997 R1100RT ZC62149(sold)
"One who does not ask questions is ashamed to learn" Danish proverb

Offline wmax351

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1237
Re: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2014, 11:53:34 PM »
You are correct. The K75 has 120 ° offset for the 3 cylinder, the K100,etc has 180 ° for 4. The sensors themselves are interchangeable.
Logged
  • Albuquerque, NM
  • 91 BMW K75 Standard, 98 Moto Guzzi California EV
Bikes:
Current:1991 BMW K75 Standard, 1998 Moto Guzzi California EV11
Past: '83 BMW R65LS, '75 Honda CB550F, '69 Honda CB175, 1999 Royal Enfield Bullet 500, 1973 Triumph Tiger TR7V, 1971 BMW R75/5 in Toaster outfit, 1979 Harley Davidson XLS-1000 Sportster Roadster

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: Hall Effect Sensor test for K 100
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2016, 09:29:00 PM »
Quote from: Laitch on March 30, 2016, 04:53:03 PM
The DAMUNdocument on MOTOBRICK differs with Vogel's K100 document because the + and - terminal labels are the opposite of the Vogel drawing. Terminals 3 and 4 on Vogel's drawing.
The positive and negative terminals are incorrectly labeled on this diagram. The positive should be on the right side and the negative should be on the left side.


This diagram in Bert Vogel's K100 troubleshooting has the correct positions of the positive and negative terminals.


The trouble shooting guide can be viewed at the link below.


Logged
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: